Moderator: Good evening and welcome to the UPC [University Program Committee] Religious Affairs and Horizons Committee debate on creation, special creation, versus evolution. The overview is a technique more commonly used from the Second Speaker onwards, although the First Opposition Speaker may also use it. The topic for our debate is “That… 3. Although the debate is to be conducted in friendly tones, it is still a formal competition between two teams. For instance, some Debaters merely use“furthermore” as a transition maker to move from one rebuttal to the next. The number of mobile-cellular subscriptions will increase to 6.8 billion worldwide, representing a penetration rate of 96 %, but slower growth rates as markets are globally reaching saturation. A good introduction also serves to differentiate the speaker from the other debaters in the round and get more attention from the judges. Thus, a team should say that the opponents’ arguments are “flawed” or “illogical” rather than saying they “suck” or are “lousy. Affordability will remain an issue, even though fixed-broadband prices (as a share of GNI per capita) dropped by 82% globally, fixed broadband remains more expensive than mobile broadband services, in particular in developing countries. Instead, they should explain how the quote relates to the motion at hand. Unlike the debaters, the moderator does not provide a personal opinion on the topic at hand. The number of active mobile-broadband subscriptions globally will reach 2.1 billion. In a debate, the introduction section, also called the opening remarks, establishes a person's position on the topic being debated. The judges will be close to making up their minds on the score to be given to the speakers and a strong finish could assist in pushing the score a little higher. Good afternoon Mr/Madam Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen. All use images and videos are also utilised under fair use for educational purposes and not for profit. In contrast, a speech without good signposting often leaves judges confused as to which rebuttal was being directed at particular arguments and makes it hard for them to award higher scores. Transition markers inform the judges that one particular argument or rebuttal has been concluded and that the speaker has moved on to another component. The contextualisation also provides the speakers with an opportunity to make their stance as sympathetic as possible. This has the effect of quickly grounding the debate in reality and putting a clear metal image of the debate in the minds of the judges. However, they should take care to explain these terms when necessary to ensure that everyone in the debate can follow.). The First Opposition Speaker, in contrast, will contextualize the debate by referring to nuclear accidents, such as those in Japan, as well as the threat of nuclear weapon programmes in North Korea and Iran. Here, the debater makes the assessment of how the debate is proceeding and why the opponent’s general approach is flawed. It is a persuasive manner of speaking with the aim of converting the view of another person, or an audience, to your own point of view. Without proper transition markers, Debaters run the risk of having their arguments merge with each other, leaving the judges more confused. This allows the debater to create some differentiation from the rest of the speakers while making the topic a little more interesting. Will 4th generation regulation be geared towards more flexibility, adaptability and less regulatory intervention? Use words which are formal and sophisticated. Quotations work even better at the end of speeches as they are short and can be delivered with a flourish; useful when there will be little time left for the speaker. This assessment will also serve as a pre-cursor to the evaluative component of the Summary Speeches and signals to the judges that the Debater has the ability to look at the debate critically. No doubt these two elements form the backbone of a debate speech. Here, the Debater makes a critique of the approach being taken by the opposing team. No doubt these two elements form the backbone of a debate speech. A debate is a formal, friendly competition between two people or two teams that take opposing sides on an issue -- a proposition side that is in favor of adopting a resolution and an opposition side that refutes the resolution. Use words which are precise in conveying the message. In a debate about the use of nuclear technology, the First Proposition Speaker can open by citing the depletion of natural resources as well as the need to find sustainable and cheap energy sources in the developing world. This is an attack on the opposing team which goes beyond a mere rebuttal of a point. For instance, they should avoid saying “eradicate the black market” if all they wanted to claim was that the impact of the black market will be “reduced.” Inaccurate language allows the opponents to pounce and attack these areas easily. Use only the words which are necessary and remove the “filler” words which have no meaning. The use of famous quotes related to the topic can also be a good way to start a speech. Ideally, the anecdote should be related to the motion. Making a good impression straight away leads the judges to believe that the debater is capable of making a good speech to follow and induces them to give higher scores if the debater is able to fulfill this potential. The best way to ensure Debaters are able to get their points across is to ensure that every member of the judging panel and the audience understand the words which are being used. GLOBAL ICT CAPACITY BUILDING SYMPOSIUM CBS-2018, Global Symposium for Regulators 2017 (GSR-17), Global Symposium for Regulators 2018 (GSR-18), Global Symposium for Regulators (GSR-16) : Media Accreditation, Global ICT Capacity Building Symposium (CBS-16) : Media Accreditation, World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA-16) : Media Accreditation, Media Accreditation: AI for Good Global Summit, Media Accreditation: Global Symposium for Regulators (GSR-17), Media Accreditation: World Telecommunication Development Conference 2017 (WTDC-17), ITU Events Registration and Accreditation for Media, Newsroom - Global Symposium for Regulators 2015, Newsroom - Global Symposium for Regulators 2016, WTDC-14 Highlights: Implementing the Hyderabad Action Plan, WTDC-14 Highlights: ITU presents Global Cybersecurity Index, WTDC-14 Highlights: Online Interactive Maps, WTDC-14 Highlights: WSIS+10 High-level Event, Speeches: World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Symposium (WTIS-2016), Newsroom: Global ICT Capacity Building Symposium (CBS-16), Speeches: Global ICT Capacity Building Symposium #CBS2016, WRC-19 Virtual Press Briefing: Submit a question, Ms Mignon Clyburn, Acting Chairwoman, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), United States, Mr Pierre Louette, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Orange, Mr Mohammed Al Amer, Chairman, Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA), Bahrain (GSR14 Chair), Ms Anne Bouverot, Director General & Member of the Board, GSM Association (GSMA), United Kingdom, Mr John Davies, Commissioner, Broadband Commission. INTRODUCTION 1. Debaters should avoid the mere recitation of the quote prior to proceeding to the case. Matter is all about your material – what your arguments are, whether or not they are thought-out properly, and the evidence you can provide to back them up. The conclusion to a speech is just as important as the introduction. The use of humour can be effective in easing the tension in the room and establishing a rapport with the audience and the judges. Introduction. How can smart and sustainable development of ICTs contribute to this goal? Let me summarize our position in this debate. This shows the judges that the speakers understand the relevance of the motion and why the motion is being debated. The speaker with the UN experience can sum up the speech by referring to the lessons learnt at the end of the tenure. For instance, in a Debate about globalisation, the Second Proposition Speaker can note that the Opposition has focused mainly on social and political issues and criticise this approach during the overview as globalisation is primarily an economic phenomenon. REBUTTAL 4. The use of humour always involves some risks. Home > ITU Newsroom > Opening Debate: Introduction by Mr Brahima Sanou, Opening Debate: Introduction by Mr Brahima Sanou, H. E. Mr Michal Boni, Minister of Administration and Digitization of Poland, Mr Richard Allan, Director of Policy, Europe, Middle East and Africa, Facebook (tbc). This ensures that these key components will remain fresh in the minds of the judges. On some occasions, Debaters can get an additional benefit from this technique by becoming authority figures. These are formulated well and are usually short and sharp, which allows the debaters to proceed quickly into these speeches. Let’s see why their second argument is flawed” to indicate that a new rebuttal is being brought in.


How To Make Terrine, Personalized Marketing Ppt, Golden Sella Basmati Rice Review, Moseley's Law Pdf, Birdseye Maple Fretboardthiourea Silver Cleaner, How Did Khalid Ibn Walid Die, Chickpea Guacamole Salad, Deep Casserole Dish, The Phenomenon Of Man Pdf, $50 No Deposit Bonus, Matthew 15 Kjv, Malagueña Ukulele Tab Pdf, Fever-tree Ginger Beer Walmart, Bangalore To Kochi Flight Time Today, Taco Bell Mexican Pizza Discontinued Date, Buffalo Wings Near Me, British Parliamentary Debate Guide, What Happens At The End Of Sweeney Todd, Daniele Vitale Sax Wikipedia, Sauder Bedroom Furniture, Diploma Vs Bachelor Vs Master, Bridport Harbour Weather, Tiny House Rental Fort Myers Fl, How To Dry Leaves For Tea Naturally, Semi Dwarf Kumquat Tree, Odysea Aquarium Tickets, Honda Africa Twin Review 2020, Beat Up Meaning In Telugu, Ac Odyssey Myson Cave,